Review of methodology

Intimate orientation could be defined by sexual identification, sexual attraction, or intimate behavior. 13 These definitions are definitely not congruent, and generally are expected to vary in level and in the long run. We selected topics based on both sexual identification and behaviour that is sexual. We utilized convenience sampling (chosen by virtue of attendance at lesbian clinics or through lesbian and bisexual women’s community teams) since lesbian and bisexual orientation that is sexual stigmatised and subjects difficult to take research. 14 The clinics had been advertised as lesbian health that is sexual, plus the study called a study of lesbian intimate wellness, so bisexual women can be apt to be under-represented. Even though the community sample had been purposively chosen to reflect demographic variety, the outcome presented may possibly not be straight generalisable to lesbians and bisexual feamales in other settings. These information aren’t designed to express all lesbians and bisexual females, but rather to explain variety of intimate history and training in a sample that is large of who possess intercourse with females.

Survey practices

Studies of intimate wellness are inevitably at risk of inaccuracies such as for instance recall bias and desirability bias that is social. 15, 16 additionally, questions regarding intimate behavior are prone to be interpreted in subtly different methods by respondents dependant on what exactly is considered “sex” or a “partner” by participants. For instance, while 85% reported webcom sex past intercourse with males, 82% reported having had several male partner that is sexual.

The study utilized a framework with primarily shut questions and predetermined response groups. The diversity that is true of history and training is therefore probably be under-represented by these outcomes. We’ve noted differing reaction prices to various specific questions; the response rates that are poorest had been for questions regarding rectal intercourse and also this may introduce response bias.

Discussion of outcomes

This study comprises the largest data set of lesbian and bisexual women’s intimate behavior in the uk. Direct evaluations of our outcomes along with other studies are hard as a result of variations in sampling practices, definitions of intimate orientation, formula of concerns, or descriptive statistics. Evaluations is created using six studies of intimate behavior which were performed through the 1990s. Two are Uk: (a) the Pride Survey, 17 a convenience sample of 278 lesbians at London’s annual Pride festival, and (b) the nationwide Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles 1990–1 (NATSAL), 18 a likelihood test of 18 876 of which 178 females reported exact same sex genital contact. Three studies are US: (c) a nationwide postal survey included into the magazine The Advocate, which recruited 6935 lesbians, 19 (d) the Boston Lesbian Health venture, a nationwide study of 1633 lesbians recruited by snowballed sampling, 20 and ( ag ag e) the National health insurance and Social Life Survey (NHSLS), 2 a likelihood test of 3432, of which 140 ladies reported exact same intercourse lovers. The very last is Australian: (f) a study of 1408 ladies who have intercourse with females going to a clinic that is genitourinary Sydney. 21

The evaluations outlined below indicate a level that is relatively high of between survey outcomes.

Within our study, genital stimulation through dental sex or penetration with hands had been nearly universally reported in intercourse between females. The application of adult sex toys and stimulation that is anal less commonly reported. Comparable choices had been recorded when you look at the Pride Survey as well as the Boston Lesbian wellness venture. The 2 probability that is national (NATSAL in the uk, NHSLS in the usa) give details just about passive or active dental intercourse between females.

Distinctions in sampling methods are going to account fully for differing proportions of topics reporting activity that is sexual males. Subjects within the Advocate, Boston Lesbian wellness, and Pride studies were defined by lesbian or bisexual identities; 77%, 77%, and 87% of participants reported activity that is sexual males. NATSAL and NHSLS had been population that is random and the Sydney STI study had been a center populace including 22% who have been intercourse employees; 96%, 98.8%, and 93percent of those participants reported sexual intercourse with guys. Information various other studies are in line with our discovering that lesbian and bisexual women’s very very very first intimate experience is often heterosexual, used many years later on by very very first exact exact same sex experience that is sexual.